Usefulness of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluating asymptomatic patients after coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND Stent implantation in coronary angioplasty has reduced the rate of restenosis, but many patients still undergo follow-up coronary angiography (CAG). The present study was a multi-center retrospective analysis of the usefulness of stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) compared with follow-up CAG in stent-implanted patients who remained asymptomatic during the follow-up period. METHODS AND RESULTS The study group of 103 patients underwent both SPECT and CAG at 4-9 months after stent implantation. Restenosis occurred in 20 (19%) of 106 vessel territories, and a reversible perfusion defect was found in 32 (30%) territories. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of SPECT were 65%, 78%, 41%, 91%, and 76%, respectively. The accuracy was lower in territories with a prior myocardial infarction (71%), in the left circumflex artery (58%), and in cases with three-vessel disease (63%). The negative predictive value was high, but 7 false negative cases included 4 cases with prior myocardial infarction, and 2 cases with reversible defects in other vessel territories. CONCLUSIONS Stress SPECT imaging is a useful tool for following up patients with coronary stent implantation, and follow-up CAG could be omitted in patients with negative SPECT imaging, no prior myocardial infarction, one- or two-vessel disease, and sufficient stress loading.